Socio-Economic and Physical Profile - Development Administration Socio-Economic and Physical Profile is structured as follows: The Physical Environment •   Physical Character –   Geographical Location and Area –   Geology –   Topography, Elevation and Slope –   Geomorphology –   Soil Type –   Erosion –   Water Resources Characteristics –   Land and Associated Soil Characteristics –   Protected Areas of Agriculture –   Atmospheric Characteristics –   Air Quality •   Land Classifications •   Preservation and Conservation Areas Demographic Characteristics •   Population Levels, Growth, Distribution & Movements –   Levels and Growth Pattern –   Population Movements –   Age-Sex Structure –   Literacy Rate –   Religious Affiliations –   Number of Households, 1970-2000 –   Population Density, 1990-2000 •   Projected Population Land Use •   Historical Land Use •   City Form and Structure –   The City's Natural & Man-Made Landmarks –   Major Paths of Movements –   The City's Edges •   Existing Land Utilization Pattern –   Urbanisation Pattern –   Agricultural Areas –   Idle Land or Grasslands –   Forested Areas –   Tourism Areas •   Land Development Trends •   Future Land Use Demand –   Urban Land Demand –   HLURB Land Use Demands •   Development Needs The Local Economy The Local Economy •   Economic Activities •   Family Income and Expenditures –   Agriculture –   Fisheries Development Program –   Agricultural Service –   Status of CARP –   Veterinary Services –   Slaughterhouse Operation –   Commercial Establishments –   Industry –   Tourism Human and Social Development •   Health, Nutrition and Sanitation –   Health Status Indicators –   Health Care Provision –   Health Resources Profile –   Development Needs •   Education, Culture and Sports –   Educational Facilities and Manpower –   Student Enrollment –   Pre-School Education –   Culture, Sports and Recreation Facilities –   Development Needs •   Housing Resettlement –   Development Needs •   Public Safety and Protective Services –   Crime Incidence –   Police Protection Personnel and Facilities –   Police Services –   Fire Protection and Prevention –   Administration of Justice –   Development Needs •   Social Welfare and Development –   Social Welfare Programmes and Services –   Development Needs •   Indigenous Communities –   Development Needs Infrastructure •   Roads and Transport –   Road Network Profile –   Bridges –   Modes of Transportation –   Traffic Prone Areas –   Upcoming Projects –   Development Needs •   Water –   Water Resources –   Existing Situation –   Development Needs •   Drainage and Sewerage –   Existing Situation –   Development Needs •   Power –   Existing Situation –   Upcoming Projects –   Development Needs •   Telecommunications –   Existing Situation –   Development Needs Environmental Management •   Solid Waste Management •   Liquid Waste Management •   Forest Resource Management •   Management of Prime Agricultural Areas •   Development Needs Development Administration •   Organisational Framework and Resource Capability –   Human Resources –   City Planning and Development Office •   Financial Capability –   Historical Income –   Historical Expenditure –   Income and Expenditure Trends –   Projected Income •   Legislative and Administrative Framework –   Zoning Ordinance •   Development Needs Financial Capability - Historical Expendentures Parallel to its growing income, San Jose del Monte's expenditure has also been increasing with its expenses in 2001 being almost four times greater than in 1996 (Table 9.4 presents). Personal Services in 1996 to 1999 accounted for the highest share, as it comprised almost half of the City's total expenditures for that period. The percentage allocated for this, however, has been decreasing. This only shows that the local government is becoming more efficient in fiscal management. It is now allocating more for direct public service than to administrative expenses. Table 9.4 Historical Expenditure Pattern (1996-2001) Table 9.5 presents the sectoral allocation and allotment of San Jose del Monte's expenditures for the period of 1996 to 2001. The largest of the City's total expenditures are spent on General Public (averaging 46 percent), Economic Services (averaging 24 percent) and Health Services (averaging 10 percent). It is also evident in these figures that for this period, expenses for Housing and Community Development were largest in 1999 when it appropriated about 11 percent of its total income for that sector. Table 9.5 Status of Sectoral Allotment Appropriation and Expenditures (Php) Figure 9.4 shows graphically the sectoral allocation of expenditures in year 2001. Consistent with the previous years, the largest expenditure of the City for that year was on General Public Services. Expenses on Economic Services came in second. Figure 9.4 2001 Sectoral Allocation of Expenditures